Observations
from my weekly wanderings, usually in Northern Virginia (NOVA).
As I
explained last week, my intention for NOVA is simply a writing exercise. (Writing
exercise: hold that thought.) I watch for some intriguing prompt; if that fails
I have a source or two that suggest a prompt.
However,
both failed this week and I’m left needing a topic. So, I’ve decided to write
about writing or more precisely about composing. Because truthfully we seldom
write: to trace or form (characters, letters, words, etc.) on the
surface of some material, as with a pen, pencil, or other instrument or means;
inscribe
I’ve
confessed elsewhere on this blog that I’m fussy about words. So although I’ll
concede there are secondary definitions of “write” which include compose, I
reject those definitions as adulterated meanings that have become acceptable by
common and prolonged misuse.
The
same way in which “literal” can now mean – exactly NOT literal. For the record,
I hate that; it signals the end of civilization as we know it.
So,
back on track, “write” is not right; “write” is wrong. I should say typing;
except it’s not typing either; it’s keystroking. I should say I need a
keystroking prompt, but that seems rather stilted. And to stick with the increasingly
absurd theme of this treatise – I didn’t “say” I need a keystroking prompt; I
keystroked it. That’s just wrong – right?
But I
don’t really want to keystroke. I want to compose. That’s the correct word.
Words
– ya gotta love em.
Personally,
I’m glad we don’t write much anymore. My writing is terrible. Do they even
teach cursive in school anymore? I’m very happy I took typing back in high
school; it was actually typing then. I can keystroke somewhere in the area of 55
words per minute, and that makes composing much easier than writing what I
compose.
I’ve
also confessed elsewhere on this blog that I hope to “write” the Great American
Novel, or at least the fairly decent Hoboken novel. I shudder at the thought of
actually “writing” it. I hope to compose by keystroking. Someday, that will be
absurd. There are already programs that convert spoken word into text files. I
prefer to keystroke. I don’t think I think fast enough to compose via spoken
word.
I
imagine, I am not the only book blogger who aspires to be a writer…err…novelist,
author, poet. If you read my post earlier this week, I won I WON! then you know
I’ve already achieved some acclaim as a writer…ummmm
I give
up: writer, writing, write – all work even if it’s actually keystroking.
But
that whole “literal” can now mean “virtual” thing – that’s pure evil.
Writing is thinking "aloud" on paper/computer screen. If we did not think, we would go (be) insane (or worse, vegetables). So, onward!
ReplyDeleteBTW, I have a slightly different take on writing (literature) at my blog posting today (Beyond Eastrod) when I consider writing (literature) as a mirror. We cannot help but gaze at the mirror. If we do not, we cease to be human. Hmmm.
Thanks for the feedback R.T.
ReplyDelete