Lord Jim (1900) by Joseph Conrad — novel #255

He [Jim] was running. Absolutely running, with nowhere to go to. And he was not yet four-and-twenty.

• by Joseph Conrad
• Modernist, Psychological novel, British novel
• Published: 1900
• My edition: Project Gutenberg Free Book (eBook)
• Setting: South Seas, Malay Archipelago, late 19^th century
• Also by this author (that I’ve read): Nostromo, Heart of Darkness

Jim, not yet “Lord Jim,” is a young Englishman, son of a parson, just beginning a promising career at sea. He is quietly confident, capable, and the very image of a man who inspires trust. Then one split-second decision aboard the Patna—a moment of treachery from the sea—shatters everything. That single failure will haunt him for the rest of his life.

 

Jim knows, with perfect and painful clarity, that this one dreadful moment is not the true measure of his soul. Yet he also knows the stigma will deny him any easy chance at redemption.

 

Captain Marlow, at first a detached observer, becomes the novel’s primary narrator and eventually Jim’s friend and advocate. Through Marlow’s layered, reflective storytelling, we follow Jim’s restless search for a place where he can prove his worth.

 

Marlow tries to help Jim escape his past—sometimes in spite of Jim himself. As Marlow reflects: 

…it is my belief no man ever understands quite his own artful dodges to escape from the grim shadow of self-knowledge.

 

I ached for Jim and found myself cheering Marlow’s efforts at redemption, even as I sometimes feared it might be hopeless, just as Marlow did.

Which of us here has not observed this, or maybe experienced something of that feeling in his own person—this extreme weariness of emotions, the vanity of effort, the yearning for rest? Those striving with unreasonable forces know it well,—the shipwrecked castaways in boats, wanderers lost in a desert, men battling against the unthinking might of nature, or the stupid brutality of crowds.

 

It’s a marvelous yarn—perhaps my favorite by Conrad yet. He writes what I call a thinking man’s adventure: morally complex, with themes of honor, redemption, self-identity, loyalty, and the painful denial (or possibility) of second chances. There are pirates, tempestuous seas, remote islands, and a beautiful girl, but the real drama is internal.

 

Conrad’s prose is beautiful and evocative, especially considering English was his third language, as the following passage, even without context (something to do with the girl) will show: 

The starlight was good enough for that story, a light so faint and remote that it cannot resolve shadows into shapes, and show the other shore of a stream.

 

Or this near the end of Lord Jim (this may seem to contain a major spoiler; don't take every word literally). 

He [Jim] passes away under a cloud, inscrutable at heart, forgotten, unforgiven, and excessively romantic

 

My rating 4/5 stars

 

 

This is title 24 of 50 for The Classics Club Challenge Round IV

 

Lord Jim is my favorite by Conrad so far. Have you read it? What are your thoughts on Conrad in general?

. 

The Final Problem: a Sherlock Holmes short story by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

If the title were not enough, Dr. Watson, opens the narrative of “The Final Problem” with shocking words:

It is with a heavy heart that I take up my pen to write these the last words in which I shall ever record the singular gifts by which my friend Mr. Sherlock Holmes was distinguished.

 

"The Final Problem” is the twelfth and final short story in The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes collection. According to The Annotated Sherlock Holmes¹, it was Holmes’ 31st case chronologically. And indeed, as Conan Doyle had Holmes fictitious chronicler, Dr. Watson, write, it was to be the final adventure of Sherlock Holmes.

 

My apologies for the implied spoiler. It is hardly a secret. After all, Sherlock Holmes himself warned that…

There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact.²

 

I can only imagine the dismay, or perhaps fury, in Jolly Ole England when “The Final Problem” was published in 1893.

 

“The Final Problem” makes the first explicit mention of Dr. James Moriarty, Holmes’ eventual
arch-enemy. However, the Sherlock Holmes novel, The Valley of Fear, published later, but chronologically occurring before “The Final Problem” alludes to Holmes’ suspicion of a criminal mastermind still on the loose.

 

In this adventure, Holmes’ arrives at Watson’s home visibly perturbed and slightly injured. Holmes relates his long-held suspicion.

As you are aware, Watson, there is no one who knows the higher criminal world of London so well as I do. For years past I have continually been conscious of some power behind the malefactor, some deep organizing power which forever stands in the way of the law, and throws its shield over the wrong-doer. Again and again in cases of the most varying sorts—forgery cases, robberies, murders—I have felt the presence of this force, and I have deduced its action in many of those undiscovered crimes in which I have not been personally consulted. For years I have endeavoured to break through the veil which shrouded it, and at last the time came when I seized my thread and followed it, until it led me, after a thousand cunning windings to ex-Professor Moriarty of mathematical celebrity.

 

Holmes further relates that he has set a perfect trap for the villain and it only awaits critical timing. The challenge for Holmes at the moment is to stay alive. Moriarty knows Holmes is on his trail and is bent on killing him.

 

This isn’t the most fascinating, nor exciting Sherlock Holmes adventure. Watson, and the reader, just have to trust Holmes both for the case and the trap that he has set for the villain.

 

And the climax, well—no one sees it. But the evidence is certain. Holmes has foiled Moriarty, who will no longer plague humanity, any more than Holmes will protect it.

 

¹ The Annotated Sherlock Holmes attempts to put all of Sherlock Holmes’ cases into their proper, fictional, chronological order.

² The Boscombe Valley Adventure

 

 

The Ascent of Rum Doodle — novel #254

The Ascent of Rum Doodle — To climb Mount Blanc is one thing; to climb Rum Doodle is quite another. ~ O. Totter 

• by W. E. Bowman
• Comic Novel, British Literature
• Published: 1956
• My edition: Pimlico paperback, 2001 (not pictured) with an introduction by Bill Bryson
• Setting: The slopes of Rum Doodle
• Title #23 of 50 for The Classics Club Challenge – Round IV

 

In the 1950s an eminent group intrepid adventurers sets out to climb the world’s highest peak: Rum Doodle, 40,000 and a half feet, in remote Yogistan. I don’t believe the book ever states it explicitly, but I had the distinct impression this was a British expedition. Who else could be described as intrepid? The expedition consists of the standard group of experts:

 

Burley – supplies

Wish – scientist

Shute – photographer

Jungle – radio expert and pathfinder

Constant – linguist

Prone – doctor

Binder – expedition leader and unreliable narrator

 

That’s the last serious thing I can say about this book, and in truth, even the names are subtle puns. The cast of characters is completed by several thousand, yes thousand, Yogistani porters, and the cook Pong, who has supernatural ability to make any food stuffs unrecognizable and inedible.

 

As I say, it’s a comic novel and nothing goes as planned. All of the experts are astonishingly inept. Burley is lazy, Wish is just silly, Shute always misses the shot, Jungle is lost in his own tent, Constant makes disastrous Yogistani translations and Prone is perpetually sick. There are gags, puns, ironies, and pratfalls on every page, but the funniest gimmick was the Yogistani porters. They would routinely be sent up and down the mountain on errands, a duty they accomplished with ease, all in support of the historic feats of the august adventurers.

 

Another bit I liked was the oft repeated saying of the enigmatic mountaineer O. Totter. At various points of impasse, someone would quote Totter’s sage surmise that…

To climb Mount Blanc is one thing; to climb Rum Doodle is quite another.

At this the adventurers would, Ah! and Yes! and Indeed! and be visibly revived by Totter’s wisdom

 

Rum Doodle feels like the story Jerome K. Jerome would write, if he were to write a mountain climbing adventure. Indeed, one of the porters is seen reading a Yogistani translation of Three Men in a Boat.

 

I envied him, because that book was funnier than this book. Rum Doodle is often described as hilarious, laugh-a-minute, or as the cover of my version says: One of the funniest books you will ever read.

 

For me, not so much. It was funny, just not laugh-out-loud funny. It may not have aged well, and the subject matter is rather esoteric. I understand that in mountaineering circles it is a cult classic and widely celebrated. There are numerous Rum Doodle namesakes worldwide including Rumdoodle Peak in Antarctica (official) and Rum Doodle Ridge of Pike’s Peak (unofficial).

 

I give it 3 stars

 

  

I learned a new phrase from this book. When mountain climbers are pondering a particular peak, and their chance of conquering it, they are apt to ask…

Will it go?

 

.

 

 

Gilgamesh: A New English Translation

The Epic of Gilgamesh — The oldest story in the world

• Author Unknown
• Epic Poem
• Written: 2100 – 1200 B.C.
• Adapted by: Stephen Mitchell
• My edition: Atria Books (eBook), 2004
• Setting: Ancient Mesopotamia and mythical locations

The Epic of Gilgamesh is an epic poem regarding King Gilgamesh of the Great Walled City, Uruk. He is the son of mortal King Lugalbanda and the goddess Ninsun, also known as Lady Wildcow (ya’d think a goddess wouldn’t stand for that). Gilgamesh is described as enormous and radiant, the text is never precise about his size, but he could travel three days and nights, without rest and cover the distance that ordinary men would travel in six weeks. He is an arrogant and ruthless ruler. The goddess Aruru creates Enkidu — as Gilgamesh’s mirror image and opposite, intending that wild and powerful Enkidu could challenge Gilgamesh and cause him to be a more gracious and beneficent ruler.

 

There are some preliminary events leading up to the challenge, rather mature content, though not graphic or explicit, but the two do indeed fight. I’ll spare the spoiler, but after their contest they become fast friends and set off on a dangerous mission to kill the dread monster Humbaba and other exploits. Eventually Gilgamesh becomes obsessed with finding the legendary man, Utnapishtim who survived the worldwide deluge, by building a large vessel, and taking earth’s creatures aboard to save them. Sound familiar? Gilgamesh believes Utnapishtim can give him the secret to eternal life, since the gods granted it to Utnapishtim after his heroics to save the creatures of Earth.

 

Technically, I didn’t read The Epic of Gilgamesh; I read Stephen Mitchell’s adaptation. I started with a literal interpretation, but it was very scholarly, with many notes, gaps, and repetitions due to slightly differing source tablets. It was very fragmentary and not very coherent. So, I switched to the adaptation, which eliminates the scholarly material and fills in the gaps. I recommend it, if you want a smooth narrative.

 

For me, the story was just ok, not The Odyssey. It’s pretty simple, pretty blunt, not a lot of drama. It does touch relatable themes of love, friendship, grief, and fear of death. It’s historically significant due to an early civilization that held a legend of a worldwide flood and a Noah character, written long before the Biblical account. That was fascinating. It’s also a pretty short read. You can easily read it in one setting.

 

Have your read this or other versions? What did you think.

 

. 

 

Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro (1989) — novel #253

The Remains of the Day — One might say, if one considers oneself an astute and worthy judge, that this is a most dignified novel. Indeed.

• by Kazuo Ishiguro
• Postmodern, British novel
• Published: 1989
• My edition: Vintage Books (eBook)
• Awards: Booker Prize for Fiction 1989 
• Setting: England, 1957
• Also by this author (that I’ve read): Never Let Me Go

Mr. Stevens is the butler at Darlington Hall, a fictitious estate near Oxford, where he has served for decades, first to Lord Darlington, and now to the new American owner Mr. Farraday. It will help, should you read this, to envision Anthony Hopkins as Mr. Stevens the first-person narrator. First person, though Mr. Stevens often refers to himself in third person, ‘oneself’, very dignified, all that. Indeed Mr. Stevens considers dignity the preeminent quality that “separates a great butler from a merely competent one.”

 

Mr. Stevens has devoted extensive thought on this subject. And while he agrees with the position of the Quarterly of the Gentleman’s Gentleman, that…

…the most critical criterion is that the applicant be possessed of a dignity in keeping with his position.

He has some of his own opinions as well.

A ‘great’ butler can only be, surely, one who can point to his years of service and say that he has applied his talents to serving a great gentleman—and through the latter, to serving humanity.

There is apparently an unofficial Hall of Fame for English butlers. At least, there is a consensus among those in the profession of who the greats are. Mr. Stevens refers to a couple of these luminaries on more than one occasion as the well-known and indisputable standards of greatness. It is clear that Mr. Stevens aspires to this level of excellence and indeed, considers himself not far from this stratum.

 

Minor spoiler alert: Although it is not apparent at first, Mr. Stevens is an unreliable narrator. In the beginning, he expresses himself with such dignity and conviction, the reader has no reason to doubt his truthfulness or wisdom. But slowly, very slowly it becomes apparent that Mr. Stevens is perhaps deluding himself. And maybe, at some level, he is painfully aware of his own delusion. This was a brilliant part of the novel for me. Some authors hit you with surprise twists without warning, but Ishiguro lets it creep up on the reader, along with the changing sympathies it brings. It is a masterful tale with themes of dignity, loyalty, and self-perception.

 

It isn’t exactly action-packed. It could be alternately titled, The Butler’s Holiday, and I would be tempted to pass it by. Well, truthfully I have—for years. But now that I’ve read it, I certainly appreciate it.

 

My rating  4 out of 5 stars

 

 

Speaking of the title, it comes from the observations of an unnamed fellow domestic that Mr. Stevens meets, while sitting by the sea shore near sundown. The gentleman remarks…

You’ve got to enjoy yourself. The evening’s the best part of the day.

I think I enjoyed this a bit more than Never Let Me Go also by Ishiguro. Have you read The Remains of the Day? Ishiguro? What else would you recommend by Ishiguro or by other authors with similar themes?

 

A few other amusing excerpts, all the opinions of Mr. Stevens.

It is sometimes said that butlers only truly exist in England. Other countries, whatever title is actually used, have only manservants. I tend to believe this is true.

Continentals are unable to be butlers because they are as a breed incapable of the emotional restraint which only the English race are capable of.

The butler’s pantry, as far as I am concerned, is a crucial office, the heart of the house’s operations, not unlike a general’s headquarters during a battle...

After Stevens makes an attempt at  'banter', a skill he convinces himself he must learn for interacting with the new American master of Darlington Hall... 

I followed this with a suitably modest smile to indicate without ambiguity that I had made a witticism, since I did not wish Mr. Farrady to restrain any spontaneous mirth he felt out of a misplaced respectfulness.

 It didn't work.

.

1,000 Books to Read Before You Die by James Mustich

1,000 Books to Read Before You Die — Not just a coffee table
book

• By James Mustich
• A book about books
• Published: 2018
• Workman Publishing Co., Inc  

My daughter gifted me this book several years ago, and I thought it was a cool book to flip through now and then. I’m an albumiphile—a lover of lists. (I invented that word, seriously!) So, this is a nice book to refer to, but not something to read cover to cover. And then one day, for some reason, I started doing just that and found it completely engrossing.

 

It's really a delightful read. Not just a coffee table book, not even just a reference book. It is sorted alphabetically by author, not sub-divided into genres. So one moment I was smugly reminiscing while reading the description of some novel I’d already read, the next finding a must-read biography, the next learning of collection of short stories, or the collected letters between two famous, or infamous, persons, or a dozen other categories. The narrative itself, by James Mustich is lovely and powerful prose. Introducing one book he writes…

For the best writers, words are tools for apprehending meaning. How those tools are shaped and sharpened by enthusiasm and experience; how their use matures from awkwardness to grace through study, labor, and luck; how they weather circumstance and setback, inspiration and inhibition—these are tales that make, for book lovers, vivid reading.

To date, I’ve read 165 of the books mentioned within 1,000 Books. I’ll never read them all, but I’ve added about a hundred titles to my TBR list, including several genres I don’t typically read. It also prompted me to move several novels higher on my reading plan. And then, there were some, I definitely surmised, were not for me. That’s a useful function too.

 

It’s definitely worth a read, whether you read about 1 or 2 books at a sitting, or binge the entire thing in a week, as I did.

 

. 

The Adventure of The Beryl Coronet: a Sherlock Holmes short story by Arthur Conan Doyle

"The Adventure of the Beryl Coronet”¹ is the twelfth and final short story in The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes collection. According to The Annotated Sherlock Holmes², it was Holmes’ 30th case chronologically.

Dr. Watson, looking out the window one winter morning, observes a well dressed madman excitedly winding his way down Baker Street (nod to Gerry Rafferty). The madman is a prominent London banker, frantically searching for 221B and the residence of Sherlock Holmes.

The beryl coronet, one of Britain’s public treasures, has been stolen, partially recovered, but missing three of the valuable jewels. The police and banker have the culprit, the banker’s son, but he is uncooperative regarding the missing pieces. In customary fashion, Holmes is unimpressed with official police narrative and the game is afoot.

I was a bit disappointed. There was none of the collegial banter between Holmes and Watson, no snide remarks on police competence, no great suspense, and the characters were not very memorable. Holmes did at least go incognito for some nighttime sleuthing, but even that was one of his more pedestrian disguises. The mystery was good, but  the other aspects of the story, just so-so.

 

¹ A note about titles: When first published serially, many Sherlock Holmes short stories did not include the noun phrase “The Adventure of” as part of the title. The noun phrase was only added later, in most cases, when the short stories were compiled into one of five collections: The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes; The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes, The Return of Sherlock Holmes, His Last Bow: Some Later Reminiscences of Sherlock Holms; and The Case Book of Sherlock Holmes. This short story was originally titled The Beryl Coronet, and later changed to The Adventure of the Beryl Coronet when it was published as part of The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes.

² The Annotated Sherlock Holmes attempts to put all of Sherlock Holmes’ cases into their proper, fictional, chronological order.

 

Recap of Novels 241 – 250

    

Average rating of novels 241 – 250:  3.5 stars (out of 5)

 

241.   ★★★★            The Dark Tower #7

242.   ★★★½            Rabbit, Run

243.  ★★★★             North and South

244.  ★★★★             O Pioneers!

245   ★★★½             Skellig
246.  ★★★★             Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy
247.  ★★½                The Great God Pan

248.   ★★                  The Counterfeiters

249.   ★★★½            A Prayer for Owen Meany

250.  ★★★½             Loving

 

 

Favorite: The Dark Tower: The Dark Tower #7

 

Least Favorite: The Counterfeiters

 

Best Hero: George Smiley from Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy

 

Best Heroine: Tie – Alexandra Bergson from O Pioneers

                                Margaret Hale from North and South

 

Best Villain: Pan

 

Most interesting/Complex character: Owen Meany

 

Best Quotation: from Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy, regarding George Smiley, he feared…the secret fear that follows every professional to his grave. Namely, that one day, out of a past so complex that he himself could not remember all the enemies he might have made, one of them would find him and demand the reckoning.

 

. 

 

A High Wind in Jamaica by Richard Hughes (1929) — novel #252

A High Wind in Jamaica—Not at all what I was expecting. BETTER! But it took me a bit to come round.

 

·      A High Wind in Jamaica by Richard Hughes

·      Alternate title: The Innocent Voyage

·      Novel

·      Published: 1929

·      Project Gutenberg (eBook, freebook)

·      Setting: Jamaica (briefly), and the high seas, mid to late 19th century.

 

Novel 22 of 50 of The Classics Club Challenge: Round IV

 

The Bas-Thornton children, John, Emily, Edward, Rachel, and Laura lead a blissful and nearly feral life in Jamaica until a storm, the “high wind” destroys their home. The family escapes mostly unscathed. Mrs. Thornton concludes… 

But the danger which their beloved little ones had been through was not a thing to risk again. Heaven had warned them. The children must go.

So the Bas-Thornton children, along with the Fernandez children, Margaret and Harry, are packed off to the safety of England. John, Emily and Margaret are over 10 and provide minimal supervision of the 4 younger children, or lidlies as they call them. England may be safe, but the high seas? Not so much. Their ship, the Clorinda, is seized by pirates. While the pirates are examining their booty, the captain of the Clorinda seizes a brief opportunity to make escape, not realizing the children are all on the pirate ship. The children believe it is just a mid-point hand-off. It takes some time before they realize they are the wards of a band of Spanish pirates.

Somehow, I inferred this was a comical farce, and this was initially confirmed by the omniscient narrator’s tongue-in-cheek account. 

Piracy had long since ceased to pay, and should have been scrapped years ago: but a vocational tradition will last on a long time after it has ceased to be economic, in a decadent form.

or

Possibly a case might be made out that children are not human either: but I should not accept it.

And although I liked it, thought it was great fun, It didn’t quite par with “classic” as it is sometimes called. As the story progressed, I was further confused first by one rather grim development, and then a second even worse. These events were grossly incongruent with the playful narration. I believe this was an intentional, and very affective, device of the author. It matched the children’s attitude. They did not recognize their peril, and thought it all high adventure. They were largely unsupervised and even indulged to some extent by the crew, who were at a loss for what to do with them.

Eventually, I understood. This is not a comic tale. It is a tale of innocence, love, human folly, and good intentions gone bad.

There were parts of this story that were rather far-fetched, and when I thought this was a comedy, that worked. However, once I realized the more somber message of this tale, those implausible moments, were, well, just implausible. But overall, still a very worthwhile read.

My rating 3 ½ out of 5 stars

 

Have you read High Wind in Jamaica? How did you feel?

One last quote by the narrator. There was a friendly pig on board for a time. As a piglet it liked to sleep on the children’s bellies. Before long it was too big for this and the positions reversed, still very much to the children’s liking.

One cannot wish for a more comfortable seat than an acquiescent pig.

 

.

The Magus by John Fowles (1966) — novel #251

Creepy! Creepy and suspenseful. I couldn’t put it down.

The human race is unimportant. It is the self that must not be betrayed. ~ Maurice Conchis, who is, the magus.

• The Magus by John Fowles
• Postmodern novel, mystery, suspense
• Published: 1966
• Revised version: 1977 with a foreword by the author
• Little, Brown and Company (eBook)
• Setting: England and Greece, 1953
• Also by this author (that I’ve read): The French Lieutenant’s Woman; The Collector

 

 

Novel 21 of 50 of The Classics Club Challenge Round IV and my “spin” book for The Classics Club Spin #43

 

My rating 4/5 stars

 

 

I said it was creepy. At first it is rather pedestrian back story. But that doesn’t last long. When the story moves to Greece, it gets creepy fast. Then maddening, then terrifying, all the while confusing, and when I’d almost given up, perhaps…redeeming?

 

Nicholas Urfe is young, middle class, English: his father is a brigadier, and according to Nicholas… 

my mother was the very model of a would-be major-general’s wife.

Nice! See what he did there?

 

Nicholas is a decent chap, Oxford grad, bit of a cavalier with the ladies, bored and without direction. He doesn’t precisely rebel against his parents or England, but he wants something different, and decides on a position in Greece, teaching English at a boys school on the fictional island Phraxos, (actual island Spetses). In his wandering, he discovers the secluded estate of a wealthy Greek recluse, Maurice Conchis. Colleagues and locals warn Nicholas away, and tell him Conchis is unapproachable, yet the first time Nicholas approaches the estate he is welcomed as if expected. The host, Conchis, is mysterious, charming, and intelligent. According to Nicholas…

He was obviously a man who rarely smiled. There was something mask-like, emotion-purged, about his face.

Conchis is highly intuitive, claims to be psychic, and seems to be playing mind-games with Nicholas. God games actually, and Nicholas’ life begins to spin slowly out of control.

 

It took me right up until the end to decide that I liked this book. Though, I was hooked at Conchis first appearance. I knew he was creepy, perhaps dangerous, but he was fascinating. And then there is a cast of characters: literally characters playing parts for Conchis. Nicholas knows they are, usually acting, but are they willing minions, coerced dupes, hypnotized subjects, paid actors, or maybe even schizophrenic? One of them happens to be a beautiful young woman, Lily, or Julie, or Vanessa. There are actually two beautiful young women, the other being Lily's twin. But Nicholas is only obsessed with the Lily, whatever her name is. Time and again, Nicholas confronts them, the twins particularly, and they seem to come clean. Nicholas, along with the reader, exhales a giant sigh of relief, and then…WHAM! Another bizarre turn.

 

Near the end I was getting a bit fed up with Fowles. I’m OK with a brilliant madman character, even a brilliant evil madman, but I was far from certain Conchis was any of that and as a spectator, I was hooked on the drama, but I couldn’t imagine the author’s point. Very near the end, when the God game is very nearly done, when Nicholas and the reader thinks it IS done, Conchis tells Nicholas...

Learn to smile, Nicholas. Learn to smile.

Nicholas should have punched him.

 

But I didn’t yet understand. I don’t approve of Conchis’ methods. You have to believe that the end justifies the means to approve, and I don’t. But I can accept that Conchis believed that. I’m not certain Fowles does. He called The Magus a “Rorschach test in psychology”. That seems about right. He also said “…there is no given ‘right’ reaction.”

 

I wouldn’t recommend it for young readers. There are a few spots that would definitely be "R" rated. If you like psychological terror or suspense, you might love this. If you dislike ambiguous endings, you may not like it, although…

 

I definitely recommend the 1977 revised version. Fowles responded to complaints about the ambiguous ending. In the foreword to the 1977 version he explains: 

I accept that I might have declared a preferred aftermath less ambiguously…and now have done so.

The ending is still ever so slightly ambiguous. However, I am convinced that what happens next is exactly what the reader is hoping for, and the end that in Conchis’ mind justified his means. It ends with a French saying, that can be translated:

Let those love now who’ve never loved;

Let those who’ve loved, love yet again.

Sort of an aside: Nicholas has three girls that he “loves” in this book: Allison, he carelessly breaks her heart before leaving England; Julie on Phraxos; and Jojo back in Jolly Old England. I doubt Nicholas would say he ever loved Jojo, but I say he did. He never slept with her, though she was willing. He unburdens himself on her, rehearses the recent follies of his life. Nicholas says of Jojo… 

She was the strangest priest to confess before; but not the worst. For she absolved me

I enjoyed this novel very much, more than my other reads of Fowles: The French Lieutenant’s Woman and The Collector. Have you read The Magus? Fowles? What did you think.

 

BTW, I've changed my review format. Feedback is appreciated. 

 

. 

 

Love’s Labour’s Lost by William Shakespeare

Love’s Labour’s Lost is a comedy by William Shakespeare, written in the late sixteenth century.

 

Ferdinand, king of Navarre, and three of his noblemen, Lord Berowne, Lord Longaville, and Lord Dumaine, swear off women for three years in order to devote themselves to study.

 

What could go wrong? The arrival of the Princess of France, and her three attendants, Lady Rossaline, Lady Maria, and Lady Katherine.

 

Now get this, you’ll never guess, but the Pincess and her ladies just happen to be beautiful, and single.

 

The play can almost write itself: well conceived for the Bard’s comedic pen.

 

But I had a little problem with it. Although the situation did indeed produce some wonderful comic moments, and witty dialogue, there were also eventualities that I found incongruent, inexplicable, or unnecessary.

 

The incongruity: The greatest weakness, in my opinion, is how how easily the King and company excuse themselves from their oaths. They had sworn that if they should break them they would…

 

Endure such public shame as the rest of the court can possibly devise.

 

But they rather flippantly decide that since love is the most worthy study, it’s ok to break their oaths.

 

The comedy is great. Their infidelity is just too easy, too quick, too without shame.

 

The inexplicable. Once they collectively decide to forget about that silly old oath, they disguise themselves as Russians in order to profess their love. Ummm…what?!?

 

Still, great comedy ensues, as the Princess and her ladies learn of this plan, and themselves exchange veils and costumes, so as to confound their lovesick admirers.

 

The Princess explains this…

 

We are wise girls to mock our lovers so.

 

And later, in a bit more detail…

 

The effect of my intent is to cross theirs:

They do it but in mocking merriment;

And mock for mock is only my intent.

Their several counsels they unbosom shall

To loves mistook; and so be mock’d withal

Upon the next occasion that we meet.

With visages display’d to talk and greet.

 

That at least makes sense.

 

The uneccesary: A bit later all deceipt is unmasked, they all have a good chuckle, and are immediately treated to a play of The Nine Worthies: the play within the play, enacted by some other minor characters in Shakespeare’s play. Ohhhkay.

 

Before The Nine Worthies is finished a messenger arrives with sad news that the Princess’ father has died, which is kind of a bummer, considering this is a comedy. In pretty short order, the King and Lords promise to wait a year and a day, while the Princess and Ladies mourn, and then all will be happily married, and all’s well that ends well…pardon the Shakespearific pun.

 

As always, I’m certain it would come off better experienced via stage rather than read. I wasn’t a big fan, due to the inconsistencies I’ve mentioned. It isn’t just me. This is not one of Shakespeare’s more respected plays.

 

Also, I don't get the second apostrophe in the title: Labour's What?