Wednesday, February 23, 2022

Go Set a Watchman by Harper Lee (novel #194)

…every man’s watchman, is his own conscience ~ Dr. John Hale Finch

 

Go Set a Watchman reads like a sequel to To Kill a Mockingbird, but it isn’t. Jean Louise Finch, known as Scout in childhood, lives and works in New York City. She returns to Maycomb, Alabama to visit Atticus, her aged father, who still practices law in the sleepy southern town.

 

Sounds like a sequel, right? The explanation is a bit complicated, and didn’t make sense when I first read it. Go Set a Watchman is the first draft of a novel that would be much revised, to become To Kill a Mockingbird. In the first draft, adult Jean Louise has numerous flashbacks to her childhood. The publisher apparently liked the flashbacks more than the main storyline and urged Harper Lee to include more childhood scenes, and eventually the entire novel became a long recollection of childhood, centering on a legal case and family crisis that is barely mentioned in the Watchman draft. The title was changed – and a masterpiece resulted.

 

But Go Set a Watchman, was never intended to be published. 

 

And in my opinion, it never should have been. There is a myriad of complex, legal, moral, ethical, and artistic controversies surrounding the publication. The book made a bunch of money, but the author was dead barely six months after publication. If I had it to do over, I don’t think I’d buy it. But I did, and I read it, so the rest of this is just my commentary on the literary merits of the book.

 

First, it isn’t as terrible as some reviews make it. In fact, there were times when I found it quite enjoyable – mostly those childhood flashbacks. Yay! more stories about Scout and Jem. But, there is a terrible dilemma. That’s good, novels need a conflict. The old south is coming to terms with the Supreme Court decision in Brown vs the Board of Education, ending racial segregation in schools. Not everyone in Maycomb takes this federal interference in state’s rights very well. And when Atticus and others are slow, or even reluctant to champion the cause of racial equality, Jean Louise is disillusioned and outraged. 

 

The narrative about the conflict is weak. It is introduced abruptly, developed unconvincingly, reaches a heartbreaking climax as Jean Louise curses her father and storms away to leave Maycomb forever. And then…all is resolved ridiculously fast in a few pages, and one shocking slap to Jean Louise’s face, by Uncle Jack. Dr. John Hale (Jack) Finch did not survive the final draft to appear in To Kill a Mockingbird. Too bad. I liked him.

 

My rating 3 out of 5 stars



This novel satisfies “a classic by a woman author”, in the Back to the Classics 2022 Challenge.


The title is taken from The Bible.

 

For thus hath the Lord said unto me,

Go, set a watchman, let him declare what he seeth. Isaiah 21:6

 

It is the text chosen by the preacher on Jean Louise’s first Sunday back in Maycomb. It isn’t momentous at the time. But later, while admonishing his niece, Uncle Jack says:

 

Every man’s island, Jean Louise, every man’s watchman, is his own conscience. There is no such thing as a collective conscious.

 

That, and a few other words of wisdom begin to turn the tide for Jean Louise, and she is soon reconciled to her father. (too easily, too quickly)

 

My favorite of Uncle Jacks aphorisms:

 

I’ll put it in my own words: the time your friends need you is when they’re wrong, Jean Louise. They don’t need you when they’re right.

 

 

Other Excerpts:

 

She did not stand alone, but what stood behind her, the most potent moral force in her life, was the love of her father.

 

She touched yesterday cautiously, then withdrew, I don’t dare think about it now, until it goes far enough away. (this one reminds me of another southern female from literature who liked to put unpleasant thoughts off for another day)

Tuesday, February 22, 2022

Top Ten Tuesday - Top Ten Dynamic Duos in Literature

TOP TEN TUESDAY is a weekly meme hosted by That Artsy Reader Girl


I haven’t participated in – yikes! Literally years. This topic caught my eye.

 

Topic for February 22, 2022: Top Ten Dynamic Duos in Literature

 

10. Rhett Butler and Scarlett O’HaraGone With the Wind

I felt an obligation for at least one romantic couple, but the most obvious choice was Romeo and Juliette, but aren’t Rhett and Scarlett so much more interesting? Of course, they’re not truly a romantic couple. Are they?


9. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. HydeThe Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

Super obvious


8. Don Quixote and Sancho PanzaDon Quixote

I didn’t love the book, but it would have been unbearable without Sancho


7. Bishop Jean Marie Latour and his vicar Father Joseph VaillantDeath Comes for the Archbishop

Marvelous book and a touching, powerful relationship


6. Tom and HuckThe Adventures of Tom Sawyer, and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

They were so often, so misguided in their understanding of the world, but they understood friendship, loyalty, and courage


5. Nick Andros and TomThe Stand

This is a little one-sided, because it is Nick’s willingness to accept the companionship of Tom – who will only add to Nick’s struggle, and Nick toyed with leaving the true-hearted man-child to his own fate. But Tom would simply have not survived in the raging world, and Nick…just couldn’t abandon him.


4. Jem and ScoutTo Kill a Mockingbird

So touching to see brother and sister also best friends.


3. George and LennieOf Mice and Men

Oh, how my heart breaks…not for Lennie, but for George and the horrible, misguided, pure intentioned decision he must make to protect his friend. This is a love story.


2. Frodo and SamThe Lord of the Rings

No commentary necessary


1. Sherlock Holmes and Dr. WatsonThe Adventures of Sherlock Holmes

There would be no pleasure in reading of the World’s Greatest Detective if not for his friend and straight man

 

.

Friday, February 18, 2022

The Recognitions by William Gaddis (novel #193)

Originality is a device that untalented people use to impress other untalented people, and protect themselves from talented people... ~ excerpt from The Recognitions

Ugh!

How do I begin to describe this novel? I thought to begin with, it is the most awful novel I’ve read, but that would be very opinionated. 

Indeed! In my opinion, it’s awful.

For starters, reviews were highly critical when it was first published, but when Gaddis' second novel J R won National Book Award, The Recognitions was re-reviewed in much more positive light. Hmmm, rather a critique of the critiquing set, in my opinion, but I think they got it right the first time.

It is a very difficult read, and it isn’t just me. Jonathan Franzen, author of The Corrections, a title which pays homage to Gaddis’ novel, says The Recognitions was “by a comfortable margin, the most difficult book I ever voluntarily read.” I’m no simpleton, but I’ll admit, I don’t like to work at reading novels. I want to be transported. So in the slightest nod to no accounting for taste, I’ll admit, if you love a challenging read, you might like The Recognitions.

But that’s not the only thing I disliked. None of the characters are believable. I’ve lived on three continents, and traveled to over a dozen countries; I've been around, and I’ve never met ONE SINGLE soul, like ANY of Gaddis characters. Several of them are losing their minds. (Many synopsis mention one character losing his mind) No, there are at least three, maybe more, and the rest are complete flakes. Yes, EVERY one. Not a single well-adjusted soul in the book.

Gaddis seems to hold everyone, except himself, in contempt. Perhaps he loathes himself as well, I’m not sure. He seems to despise religion, capitalism, art, and society. His sole argument for his contempt is the fact that he holds them in contempt. 

Ugh!

There isn’t a single coherent storyline, but I believe there is a single complex theme. Admittedly, I didn’t “work” to understand it. I read every one of the half-million words, mostly to have read every word, to check this one off the list. But still I think I caught the theme: something to do with recognizing the authentic vs the pretentious. There is a counterfeiter, a plagiarist, a forger, and dozens of unoriginal bohemian caricatures. And mirrors; lots and lots of mirrors. Mirrors come up frequently, far too often to be accidental, as does the word "recognition". When any of these pretentious souls, catch their reflections, willingly or accidentally, in the mirrors. Do they recognize themselves?

I can’t recommend it. I won’t reread it, and I may drop the remaining Gaddis off my TBR.

I hate to be so critical. I can almost hear the fans, and see them looking down their nose at me with a smug grin and derisive chortle..."Just because you don't get it, doesn't mean it isn't profound."

True! And just because no one understands someone, it doesn't make them an artist. 

Sorry.

My rating 1 1/2  out of 5 stars


 

 
This novel satisfies “a 20th Century classic” (1955), in the Back to the Classics 2022 Challenge.


.