Wednesday, August 14, 2013

The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien (16 down, 84 to go) not despise the lore that has come down from distant years; for oft it may chance that old wives keep in memory word of things that once were needful for the wise to know.

The Lord of the Rings is a third-person narrative, epic fantasy, set in Middle Earth, inhabited by elves, dwarfs, mortal men, wizards, dragons, other nasty beasts, and of course hobbits. The Hobbit is prequel to LOTR, is a bit less epic, a bit more whimsical, and tells the tale to set the stage for the great tale - the tale of The One Ring of Power.

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Those of you who know me, know this will be a review of glowing praise. Apart from the Bible, there is nothing I have re-read more than The Lord of the Rings. It a trilogy, but one story and “The List” counts it as one. I first read LOTR when I was 10, thanks to my sixth-grade teacher Mrs. Banks. She will forever be my favorite teacher and LOTR will always be my favorite novel. I haven’t kept track, but I know this was at least my sixth reading and likely not the last. In my opinion, you simply cannot read LOTR without first reading The Hobbit, so I re-read that again as well and this review covers both.

Simply put, LOTR is the most enjoyable thing I’ve ever read. I don’t call it the greatest or best novel I’ve read, because I have read a few – a few – that I think are greater literary achievements. But again, nothing more enjoyable. I wish I could unread it, have my memory purged, and read it again anew.

So why do I love it so much? Well, I'd rather not get too analytical; it is pure escape and an epic contest between good and evil. The heroes, Bilbo, Aragorn, Gandalf, Sam, Frodo, et al have their flaws, but are still clearly heroes. There are lesser villains such as Smeagol and Saruman. You wish for their defeat, perhaps even destruction, but you also find them pitiable. One of my favorite characters, Boromir, is the most ambiguous. Is he a hero or villain? A hero in my opinion, though misguided and beguiled by the evil power of the ring. Denethor is somewhat the same. Boromir’s brother Faramir however, is magnificently noble and wise, if somewhat less mighty. THE Villain though, is as vile as can be.

LOTR is superbly written. There are passages of dialogue that made me laugh out loud, literally, and others that brought tears to my eyes, literally. There is narrative so terrifying that I slept, or more precisely lay awake with the light on, when I was 10 of course, not this most recent reading. The dialogue between Faramir and Eowyn when they are discovering their love for one another is beautiful beyond my ability to describe. There is also a delightful conversation between Gimli the dwarf and Eomer the mortal man and warrior of Rohan. When Gimli and Eomer first meet, it is tense and dangerous, neither sure if the other should be counted friend or foe. They eventually agree they fight the same enemy but there is still tension, including a disagreement about the Lady Galadriel, whether she is good or evil. Gimli challenges that if Eomer ever actually meets Galadriel, and does not profess her to be the most beautiful and virtuous creature in middle earth, the two will be obliged to fight in mortal combat. Eomer does indeed finally meet Galadriel, but he also meets the Lady Arwen, who he judges of equal goodness, but slightly greater beauty.

And before he went to his rest he (Eomer) sent for Gimli the Dwarf, and he said to him: "Gimli Gloin's son, have you your axe ready?"
"Nay, lord," said Gimli, "but I can speedily fetch it, if there be need." 

"You shall judge" said Eomer, "For there are certain rash words concerning the Lady in the Golden Wood that lie still between us. And now I have seen her with my eyes."

"Well, lord," said Gimli, "and what say you now?"

"Alas," said Eomer, "I will not say that she is the fairest lady that lives."

"Then I must go for my axe", said Gimli.

"But first I will plead this excuse", said Eomer, "Had I seen her in other company, I would have said all that you could wish. But now I will put Queen Arwen Evenstar first, and I am ready to do battle on my own part with any who deny me. Shall I call for my sword?"

Then Gimli bowed low. "Nay, you are excused for my part, lord", he said, "You have chosen the Evening; but my love is given to the Morning."

Some have speculated that LOTR is an allegory, which seems to make sense. Tolkien was a good friend of C.S. Lewis who is best known for his classic allegory The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe. There are elements in the LOTR that certainly seem allegorical. The Eagles for instance, that always show up near the end of epic battles to save the day. Surely the Englishman Tolkien intended the Eagles to represent America. However, the allegory theory falls apart on one very important point: Tolkien stated unequivocally that it was not an allegory. I have to believe the author.

I could go on and on, and show what a geek I am, but I’ll stop. I loved it. If you haven’t read it you should.

Other Quotations:

If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. But sad or merry, I must leave it now. Farewell. ~ Thorin Oakenshield

Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens. ~ Gimili the Dwarf

What? In riddles? No! For I was talking aloud to myself. A habit of the old: they choose the wisest person present to speak to: the long explanations needed by the young are wearying. ~ Gandalph

Don't trust your head, Samwise, it is not the best part of you. ~ Sam

We who have lived long under the Shadow may surely listen to echoes from a land untroubled by it. ~ Denethor, Steward of Gondor

Gandalf! I thought you were dead! But then I thought I was dead myself. Is everything sad going to come untrue? ~ Sam

And all the host laughed and wept, and in the midst of their merriment and tears a clear voice of the minstrel rose like silver and gold, and all men were hushed. And he sang to them, now in the elven-tongue, now in the speech of the West, until their hearts, wounded with sweet words, overflowed, and their joy was like swords, and they passed in thought out to regions where pain and delight flow together and tears are the very wine of blessedness.

Cover Art: The 1965 paperback versions pictured above are the first American paperback editions, and the first I read - and yes, I still have them. These are scans of my covers. The artwork is by Barbara Remington and when the three books are put together it forms a mural, a schema for the story. I once had a very large poster depicting the mural, but sigh - that I no longer have.

Film Renditions: No comment on earlier film renderings. Peter Jackson’s masterpiece was, well…I’ve already shown my hand. I thought it was marvelous. I am glad a Tolkien fan directed the films. Jackson did a marvelous job. In my opinion he was true to the novel. I know there were a few omissions and a few departures. I think the omissions were excusable, and the departures understandable. The only departure that I have real issue with is the portrayal of Faramir. Faramir is one of the most truly noble, humble, good, kind, and valiant characters in the book. And though I feel strongly about the injustice done him in the film, a single major issue in over 11 hours (extended edition) is pretty good, so I’ll give Jackson a pass. The Hobbit films...not so much, though Martin Freeman was perfect as Bilbo.



  1. What a review! I wish Tolkien could read it. No, I have not read LOTR but I felt your passion and that tempts me to read the trilogy. You wrote from the heart, quite moving review and tribute. And I loved the quotations too. ~ Mary Ann D.

  2. Per our discussion today, we're of a mind on Faramir. I agree with you on Jackson's movies, but I will say he has taken a little heat on the Faramir issue and his attempts to explain it away were paltry at best. I remember one thing he said was he didn't believe anyone could resist the ring. While he has a wonderful job with the movies, this completely and utterly misses the point of Faramir. Rich

  3. Love your review! Yes, I am a year late but reviews don't really become outdated do they? The Lord of the Rings are amazing. I didn't want the books to end. Thankfully, there is The Silmarillion and the Children of Hurin etc. I'm currently building up my Tolkien collection. God bless Christopher Tolkien for publishing so much of his father's works posthumously. The Lord of the Rings book is so much better than the movies. And the Hobbit movies? Why? Anyway, here is my review:

    1. Nope...never too late. Tolkien also has some short stories: Farmer Giles of Hamm; The Smith of Wooten Major; and one I particularly like Leaf by Niggle.

  4. I'm going to be re-reading Lord of the Rings this year and I'm quite excited about it! I enjoy reading Tolkien, and am awed by the minute details of his world-building. However, I would never trash Harry Potter. I think Rowling has done an amazing job with her world-building as well. To be honest, I think comparing Middle-Earth and the world of Harry Potter is like comparing apples and oranges!

    1. No Harry Potter trashing intended. That paragraph was very much tongue in cheek.

  5. A Boromir fan! Excellent :-D

    I must take issue with your pronouncement that a person who hasn't read The Silmarillion isn't a true Tolkien fan, but... other than that, I agree with most of what you say here :-)

    And finally... have you seen The Battle of the Five Armies? I only liked the first two Hobbit movies okay, but this one -- wow. Blew me away.

    1. I was ready to recant, as it is admittedly an opinionated statement, but....
      I began the offending paragraph acknowledging I am a Tolkien snob, and if you temper it with the last sentence of the paragraph...I think it is not quite so egregious, and as it is an opinion...I'm sticking with it. :)

      I just saw Five Armies today. It was better than the second Hobbit film, but I'm still disappointed overall. I can scarcely believe it was done by the same crowd as LOTR.

    2. I only said that because I haven't read The Silmarillion yet myself, you see, so it pains me to be declared a not-true Tolkien fan. A false Tolkien fan? Whatever, I'm just kidding around :-) I'm definitely not a Tolkien snob, hee.

      I'm sorry to hear you weren't that impressed by Five Armies. I don't love this trilogy like I love the LOTR movies, but I thought it was quite good. I get great joy from the character development for both Bilbo and Thorin over the course of all three movies in particular. But... no one can like everything! I happen to hate potatoes, which most people find staggeringly weird.

    3. *bows* I humbly apologize for implying you are not a true fan.
      But can you not love potatoes?

    4. It's the texture -- too many little grainy bits -- and how dry they are. Mostly I just hate baked potatoes, and badly prepared mashed potatoes. And really thick french fries that are full of dry potato-ness.

  6. Oh man, somehow blogger ate my first comment, which was quite long. I can't remember everything I wrote, but I will say I love the books and your review and I need to reread them soon.

    1. Sorry I missed that, but thanks for the feedback. I'll be certain to check your review when you get around to rereading.

  7. Fantastic review! I love LotR and have read it 3 times. I am not sure when I will read it again, but I will someday.

    On the Eagles: they go back a long way in Tolkien's work; for example, they rescued Beren & Luthien at one point. So it is hard to attribute specific political relevance to them since they were part of his work (in some form) for decades. Also I think that for Tolkien, allegory has to be intentional; that is what distinguishes it from symbolism. (He talks about this in the Foreword.)

    On The Silmarillion: I really love it but it is very different from LotR. I don't necessarily expect everyone to like it, but I am curious about your reaction if you get a chance to read it.

    1. I've read The Silmarillion, but before I was blogging. I'll get to another reread someday and post my thoughts. Thanks for the feedback.


Comments are always welcome. In fact, they make my day. You needn't sign in to leave a comment. Just enter your comment, then on the "Comment as:" drop down menu, select "anonymous".