Observations from my weekly wanderings, usually in Northern Virginia (NOVA).
I’m
usually all about reading here, but if you’d like to SEE what The 100 Greatest
Novels look like – here ya go.
All six
rows in the left column plus the top row in the second column. Alphabetical by
author from Douglas Adams – Richard Wright. If you bother to count, there are 117
because six of the novels came in more than one volume (Les Mis 2 vol., The
Chronicles of Narnia 7 vol., Remembrance of Things Past 3 vol., Dance to the
Music of Time 4 vol., The Hobbit + LOTR 4 vol., and War and Peace 3 vol.)
Here is a
different visualization. These are not necessarily the versions I own, but
rather, covers I like. In the order I read them from The Great Gatsby – The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
This blog was originally about my Quest to read the 100 Greatest Novels of All Time. It has since morphed into something
more, which will allow me to continue blogging once the quest is complete, but…
As I near completion of the original quest, I
am contemplating the meaning of “Greatest Novels of All Time”.
It’s a misnomer – there is no indisputable
list of “Greatest Novels”. There cannot be as there is no official keeper of
literature in the world, no person or organization with claim to final authority.
Truthfully my quest then, is to read 100
Novels that are widely, but not universally, believed to be some of the greatest.
I have to admit, I’m a little frustrated by
the imprecision of that. The pragmatic within wants an unbiased test that
results in “GREAT” officially stamped on dustjacket, but the poet says, it’s
art – you can’t – you can’t objectively measure the quality of art.
I’m tempted to declare the poet the winner and
close the debate, but there remains that part of me that wants the official seal
of greatness on the dustjacket.
There is something pretty close – the test of
time. It is not a criterion but rather evidence of greatness. If a novel passes
the test of time, if 100 years later people are still reading it, discussing it, adapting it to
stage and film, if it appears on some list of 100 Greatest – that’s about as
close as it’s going to get to the official seal.
Are there contemporary authors whose works are
great? Undoubtedly, but they don’t get that “official seal” until they pass the
test of time. I read Stephen King recently for the first time and loved it. I’ll
go out on a limb and say I think he’ll still be read 100 years from now. Not
much of a gamble that, but if so – then it’s official (almost).
Author Laura Hillenbrand (Seabiscuit: An
American Legend; Unbroken: A World War II Story of Survival, Resilience, and
Redemption) wrote an opinion piece for the NY Times in 2001: Waiting for the Next Secretariat, in which she wrote,
True greatness is extremely rare…
I think that’s very important. If we dole out
the greatness label too liberally…if too many novels are great – then none are.
Greatness by definition MUST be rare.
The Greatest Novels? Everyone is entitled to
an opinion, no one has the final say, time will tell.
Mind blowing eh?
And I’m not even close to done. Changing
subjects – slightly
I’ve read these 100 novels (actually 97 as of today).
I loved some, liked a lot, disliked a few, and a couple – nearly hated em.
How can that be? They have all stood the test
of time; they are all widely considered great, and yet I didn’t like some? I
mean Ulysses – really? I must be a simpleton.
That can’t be right, so I will now search for
a more flattering explanation.
The simplest is this: What I like is not necessarily
synonymous with what is great.
***mic drop***
You can quit reading now. The rest is just
expounding on that thought.
What qualities of a novel will cause me to
love/like it?
It must be a compelling story, competently
told.
Does that remind anyone of this scene from Dead Poet’s Society? For the record – I love this movie, but I do not concede to
Mr. Keating’s romantic assertion that the pages of the imaginary text are
excrement, let me posit that there is some merit to the two axis graph. I think
poetry, or any art form, can be subjected to scholarly criticism. An evaluation
of “how artfully the objective was rendered” and “how important is that
objective” might be good measures for poetry, but I think less so for prose
fiction. For one thing, I don’t think the axis are of equal importance.
Secondly, and since this is about my perceptions of a novel, I will change the
axis slightly to suit my own purpose.
-- Axis A: Compelling / Good Story (more
important than Axis B)
-- Axis B: Competent / Prose aptitude (not to
be discounted entirely)
Compelling – having a powerful or irresistible
effect. For fiction then, in my opinion, the powerful effect is making me think
and/or feel; the writing should be thought provoking and/or emotion evoking.
The more profound my thoughts or the more powerful my emotions – the more
compelling the novel.
Competently written – obviously, this would be
a lengthy discussion and one I am not particularly well qualified to expound.
Suffice it to say, the stylistic aptitude of the writer certainly has an effect
on the appeal of their work, just less so in my opinion, than their craft as a
story teller.
Obviously, the ideal is to have a compelling
story that is competently written, but my point is, they are not of equal
importance. STORY is the thing.
I am certain to like a good story, expertly
told (high compelling, high competent). I may still like a good story that is
told with adequate skill (high compelling, medium competent). I will probably
not like a good story, that is poorly written (high compelling, low competent),
but I will certainly dislike a story told with perfect prose that is not
at all interesting (low compelling, high competent), like an elegant narrative
describing the life cycle experiences of a kitchen sink.
I’m going to circle back to “Greatest Novels”
briefly. Just my opinion, but I think those novels that have passed the test of
timelessness, have done so because they are compelling (at least to a large
segment of readers) and competently written.
Summary:
Great Novels – open for debate; difficult to define,
easier to recognize by their timelessness.
Wanderer’s Favorites – Compelling and competent: novels that inspired thought and/or
emotion, also easy to recognize by 4 to 5 stars.
Sorry, you could have skipped everything and just read the
summary.
.
