The first inspiration came in 2003, when The Guardian, British newspaper, published a list of the 100 Greatest Novels of all Time. I considered myself pretty well read, but upon examining their list I discovered I’d read less than one-fourth. (to see my actual list, click HERE)
Until a second inspiration: the movie Julie and Julia, about a young woman, Julie, who sets out to make every recipe in Julia Child’s cookbook and blog about it. It was a cute movie, and it also inspired me to take up my quest again. This time more systematic, more committed, and of course this time I’d blog about my progress. I settled the systematic part with the following rules. The blog helps me stay committed.
Rule #1 Use the Official 100 Greatest Novels of All Time List. Alas, I‘m confounded before I’ve begun. There is no such list. There are plenty of lists, just not THE list. I could pick one but I didn’t want my first step to be so arbitrary. I wanted something unbiased that would satisfy academic scrutiny and popular opinion at the same time. Therefore, I created a composite of six different Greatest Novels lists: Time Magazine, The Guardian Newspaper, The Great Books Guide, The Modern Library (the Board’s list and the Reader’s list), and The Best 100 Lists (voted by regular people). It is still somewhat arbitrary but I believe it achieves a degree of consensus. If you disapprove and care to sponsor my quest (pay me), you may choose the list. Rank is first a factor of how many source lists on which each book appears. Novels 1-4 are on all six lists; 5-15 are on five of six; 16-25 are on four of six; 26-69 are on three of six; and 70-100 are on two of six. Subsequent rank is the result of simply averaging each novel’s rank on the source lists. Hereafter, there shall be no more math. This is about readin and ritin…not rithmatic.
Rule #2 No cheating. I know; a no cheating rule is superfluous; I have my reasons. There are novels that I think should be on the list that are not, such as Tom Sawyer which I think is better than Huck Finn, but as I said in rule #1, I am aiming for unbiased. You’ll probably discover an omission that you find outrageous. Don’t whine. I’m not changing the list. That’d be cheating and there is no cheating. Get it now?
Rule #3 Disclaimer: it’s not really “of all time”, but rather all time up to and including 2010. If someone writes the 32nd greatest novel of all time tomorrow, I’m not reshuffling the entire list.
Rule #4 No time limit. I love to read but I have other demands on my time. I don’t know how long it will take. If you care to sponsor my quest, we can discuss a deadline, right after we negotiate salary. Upon reaching mutually agreeable terms, I’ll quit my day job. Otherwise, I’ll finish when I close the cover of The Stand.
Rule #5 No credit for previous reads. I’ve read many of these before, but it doesn’t count. It all starts now.
Rule #6 I may disqualify a book at my discretion. I’m not a prude but I don’t want to read porn. There are a few titles that already concern me a bit. If I discover one that offends my sensitivities I will eliminate that novel and select the next alternate from the remaining books not in the top 100 selected by rule #1.
Rule #7 To be read in order, unless I have some difficulty in obtaining a book. In that case, I will skip ahead, and return to the skipped title when possible.
Rule #8 And final (I think…for now), No Spoilers. I know no one will be reading this blog at first, but I am naïve enough to think I will have millions of fans by the time I get to A Passage to India. I’d welcome comments, or objections to my own, but please don’t spoil what I have not yet read. Dig? Cool.
Not a rule, just an FYI sort of thingy New to blogging, learning as I go. Unless this is much harder than I think, My List will be posted shortly hereafter. I'd welcome comments on what you think of My List.