Wednesday, December 31, 2025

2025 Reading Year in Review

 2025 

  

I read 21 individual works: 12 novels/novellas; 1 short story collection, 1 Sherlock Holmes short story; 1 Biography; 1 Christian non-fiction; 1 other non-fiction, 3 Christmas reads; and The Bible: New American Standard Bible.

 

 

Novels:

Wizard and Glass: The Dark Tower #4 by Stephen King

Wolves of the Calla: The Dark Tower #5 by Stephen King

Song of Susannah: The Dark Tower #6 by Stephen King

The Dark Tower:The Dark Tower #7 by Stephen King

Rabbit, Run by John Updike

North and South by Elizabeth Gaskell

O Pioneers! by Willa Cather

Skellig by David Almond

Tinker, Tailor,Soldier, Spy by John le Carré

The Great God Pan by Arthur Machen

The Counterfeiters by Andre Gide

A Prayer for Owen Meany by John Irving

 

Short Story Collection:

They Shoot Canoes Don’t They? by Patrick F. McManus

 

Sherlock Holmes short stories by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle:

The Adventureof Wisteria Lodge

 

Biographies:

The Last Founding Father: James Monroe a Nation’s Call to Greatness

     By Harlow Giles Unger

 

Christian Non-Fiction

All of Grace by Charles H. Spurgeon

 

Other Non-Fiction:

Surely You’re Joking Mr. Feynman by Richard P. Feynman

 

Christmas reads:

The Little Match Girl by Hans Christian Anderson

The Family Under the Bridge by Natalie Savage Carlson

The Best Christmas Pageant Ever by Barbara Robinson

 

Reading Challenges:

What’s in a Name? 2025

.

 

Tuesday, December 23, 2025

Chistmas Tales 2025

The Magi honored the Christ child with three gifts. 

In honor of the magi, I read three Christmas tales each December.

 


The Little Match Girl by Hans Chistian Anderson, 1845

 

The very short story of a poor girl selling matches, cold and shoeless, New Year’s Eve in some great European city. It felt like London, but perhaps Anderson envisioned Copenhagen. The little match girl hasn’t sold any matches and she knows her fathter will beat her if she doesn't. In despairing cold, she lights a match to warm herself and in the comfort of the flame she sees a sumptuous feast. She lights another and sees a family gathering around a beautiful Christmas tree. She lights another and sees her dear Grandmother, the only soul who ever loved her. To preserve the reverie, she lights the whole bundle of matches and is lost in the warmth of her Grandmother's love and the vision becomes reality when she is released from all suffering by the one who knows what it is to find no welcome on a winter night.

 

It is a bittersweet tale, very reminiscent of The Beggar Boy at Christ’s Christmas Tree by Dostoevsky, 1876. Perhaps Dostoevsky borrowed a bit from Anderson.

 

 

The Family under the Bridge by Natalie Savage Carlson, 1858

     Illustrated by Garth Williams

 

Armand is a hobo, roaming the streets of Paris, Christmastime very early 1900s. He is a very contented hobo with a carefree life of no work and no responsibility. He tells a friend… 

“I can’t abide children,” grumped Armand. “Starlings they are. Witless, twittering, little pests.”

His friend, kindly old Mireli… 

…shook her finger at him. “You think you don’t like children,” she said, “but it is only that you are afraid of them. You’re afraid the sly little things will steal your heart if they find out you have one.”

Forshadowing, that.

 

Armand seeks refuge in a favorite spot under a particular bridge only to find it occupied by three little “starlings”: Suzy, Evelyn, and Paul, and even a dog who "should be white" named Jojo. I bet you can’t guess what happens.

 

It is a sweet tale with surprising adventures, and a happy Christmas ending.

 

The illustrations, including the cover seen here, by Williams are marvelous.

 

 

The worst Best Christmas Pageant Ever by Barbara Robinson, 1972 

 

The Herdmans were absolutely the worst kids in the history of the world. 

So this children’s novel begins as narrated by Beth Bradley, a grade school classmate of Imogene Herdman, the notorious ringleader of the Herdman children. They steal, swear, smoke, set fires, and bully the other children and some adults. Beth’s mother is the reluctant director of the annual Christmas pageant, which is doomed to be the worst ever when the Herdmans volunteer for the lead roles. No one else volunteers under threat of violence by the Herdmans. Imogene herself will play the Virgin Mary.

 

There is of course, outrage and thoughts to abandon the pageant, but perhaps miraculously, the show goes on, and although decidedly unorthodox, there is a powerful and poignant ending that makes it the best pageant ever.

 

It is a marvelous tale, comic enough to make me laugh out loud, but oh — there is something so much more profound, so much more glorious.

But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the Kingdom of Heaven. ~ Matthew 19:14

 

 

Merry Christmas

          ~ The Wanderer

 

May you be blessed with

the spirit of the season, which is Peace,

the gladness of the season, which is Hope,

and the heart of the season, which is Love

 

 .

 

Thursday, December 18, 2025

A Prayer for Owen Meany by John Irving, 1989 (novel #249)

I am a Christian because of Owen Meany. ~ John Wheelwright

A Prayer for Owen Meany is a coming-of-age story that is clearly personal for Irving, yet with themes that should resonate with many: friendship, fate, childhood-trauma, disillusionment, and faith. More than anything else it is Owen Meany’s life and testimony to the idea that everything happens for a reason.

 

In the opening paragraph, narrator John Wheelwright reveals some astonishing things about his friend Owen. According to John, Owen…

had a “wrecked voice”

was “the smallest person I ever knew”

was “the instrument of my mother’s death”

and was “the reason I believe in God”

Owen and John were best friends, indeed each other’s only friend, growing up in Gravesend, New Hampshire. Most of the novel is John’s childhood and young adult memories from the 1950s – 60s New Hampshire, with occasional flash-forwards to his current life in Canada, 1987.

 

Owen is an unusual child: small and with an unnatural high-pitched voice, which Irving always denotes by putting Owen’s dialogue in all-caps. (not yelling, just distinctly Owen Meany’s voice). Owen’s unimpressive physical traits are offset by a highly intelligent and perceptive mind.

 

Several events in Owen’s life convince him that he is fated, or more precisely, chosen by God for an extraordinary purpose. Some of these epiphanies are vague, some are crystal clear, such as the precise date of his own death. Owen develops several puzzling obsessions, such as practicing a basketball shot over and over, for years, with John. Neither were basketball players, and the shot would not have been lawful in any regard, and yet Owen is obsessed with perfecting the shot in under three seconds.

 

All these quirks are quite out of character for Owen and puzzling to John, but John obliges as he has become accustomed to Owen’s eccentricities. Owen never reveals all that he knows — or believes? — about his destiny, but John begins to realize that Owen is convinced about his fate and calling.

 

At first, I just thought Owen was a little nuts. Along with John I slowly realized he was a man on a mission. According to John…

…on the subject of predestination, Owen Meany would accuse Calvin of bad faith. 

And… 

I know that Owen didn’t believe in coincidences. Owen Meany believed that “coincidence” was a stupid, shallow refuge sought by stupid, shallow people…

Irving’s narration, via John is vivid and accessible. The characters are hopelessly flawed and believable, with the possible exception of Owen, who is intended to be extraordinary. Irving paints a quaint picture of a small-town New England where everybody knows everyone, and the slightly annoying issue that they know everyone’s business too.

 

John Wheelwright is in many ways autobiographical, but Irving has stated the character is a “what-if” version of himself. John is boring, even to himself, but he has Owen, and according to John… 

Owen Meany was enough excitement for a lifetime.

That’s the good stuff. But Irving does something during the flash-forward sections that I didn’t like. John, and I presume Irving by proxy, makes political commentary on the United States late 1980s. I didn’t feel it was relevant or necessary to the story; nor was it compelling. I believe the author has the right to use his novel in this way, and I have the right to not like it. I didn’t like it. I found it hypocritical when John accused a historical person of “bullying patriotism” and more so when John admitted that he possessed a “shallow, superficial” understanding” of world affairs, but not such that it stopped him from his own intellectual bullying.

 

Overall, it was an enjoyable read. I’m taking off half a star for the politicization.

 

My rating: 3 ½ out of 5 stars


 

 

This novel satisfies the “First and Last Name” category (the title must contain a first and last name) in the What’s in a Name? 2025 challenge.

 

.