Wizard and Glass: The Dark Tower series #4 by Stephen King (novel #238)

What you call ‘the bottom line,’ Eddie, is this: I get my friends killed. ~ The Gunslinger

Wizard and Glass is #4 in Stephen King's eight-volume The Dark Tower series. It is a dark fantasy set in Earth’s future, where physical and metaphysical laws are significantly altered. There is some collective memory of the old world, and characters describe the present state as a world that has “moved on.” There are portals between Roland’s world and the old world.

 

Roland Deschain is a Gunslinger, not so much a description as a title or profession: a knightly order trained in personal combat to be defenders of justice. Roland is the last of the gunslingers. He is on a quest to find the Dark Tower, and once finding it presumably to set something right that has somehow gone wrong in the world that moved on.

 

Thus far, the exact purpose of gaining the Dark Tower is not precisely clear, but it does begin to come into focus in volume #4.

 

In volume #1, The Gunslinger, Roland was alone. In volume #2, The Drawing of the Three, he picks up two companions from 20th-century America: Eddie, a former drug addict, and Susannah, a former schizophrenic and double-leg amputee. Eddie and Susanah become Roland’s companions and gunslingers in training. In volume #3, The Waste Lands, the three risk great peril to add one more to their group, a boy named Jake, also from the 20th century. It is unclear if Jake will become a gunslinger. Roland loves him like a son, but nothing…NOTHING…is more important than finding the Dark Tower.

 

Wizard and Glass is more of a flashback than anything else. Roland’s companions question him about his past, his family, how he became a Gunslinger, a lost love he occasionally refers to, and the origins of his quest for the Dark Tower. Most of this volume is the four sitting around the campfire as Roland recounts his past. I can imagine that during the original publication, readers were clamoring for Roland’s backstory. This is it.

 

I didn’t have to wait for the next volume to be published, but I was just as anxious about this missing segment. It is riveting and tragic – my favorite in the series thus far.

 

After Roland finishes his story, he releases his four companions from their part in his quest, even though he knows they are critical to success. The retelling of his tale sharply highlights his sacrifice, and Roland will no longer risk everything and everyone for the Dark Tower.

 

My rating: 4 out of 5 stars

 

 

There is little humor in this story, but occasional comic relief. Roland is typically stoic and even severe. He espouses a mystic notion of ka: something like fate, but when his companions use ka in argument against him, Roland's only response is “kaka”.

 

…the three of them stared at him, mouths open.

Roland of Gilead had made a joke.

 

In the world that has moved on, there are vestiges of former things though sometimes a bit confused: some ancient songs are remembered, Hey Jude, for instance; Punch and Judy shows are played now as Pinch and Jilly; derelict vehicles and buildings bear meaningless words such as Chevrolet or Citgo; people remember Arthurian legend; and there are memories of the ancient religion and Jesus, relegated to legend himself.

 

On a personal note, I felt it was time to address this treatment of Christ. As a Christian, I considered abandoning this series for this near blasphemy, but after prayerful consideration, I don’t feel that is necessary. I am not inclined to defend that decision here. I only felt compelled to profess that Jesus Christ is not a legend and never will be, no matter how the world may move on.

 

Peace

 

.

What's in a Name? 2025

 

This is my fifth time taking the What’s in a Name Challenge, hosted by Carolina Book Nook

 

The title of the books must contain or refer to one of the following subjects:

 

Cardinal Direction

Wanderlust

First and Last Name

Alliteration

Deity

Crime

My choices for these categories:

 

Cardinal Direction

North and South

Elizabeth Gasekell

 

Wanderlust

O Pioneers

Willa Cather

 

First and Last Name

A Prayer for Owen Meany

John Irving

 

Alliteration

Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy

John le Carré

 

Deity

The Great God Pan

Arthur Machen

 

Crime

The Counterfeiters

Andre Gide

 

.

2024

I read 25 individual works: 13 novels/novellas; 1 Sherlock Holmes short story;  2 Shakespeare comedies; 5 non-fiction works; 3 Christmas reads; and The Bible: New Living Translation.

 

 

Novels:

Martin Chuzzlewit by Charles Dickens

The Screwtape Letters by C. S. Lewis

The Clan of the Cave Bear by Jean M. Auel

A Fire Upon the Deep by Vernor Vinge

The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton

Pippi Longstocking by Astrid Lindgren

Dandelion Wine by Ray Bradbury

For Whom the Bell Tolls by Ernest Hemingway

Hangover Square by Patrick Hamilton

The Day of the Jackal by Frederick Forsyth

The Gunslinger: The Dark Tower #1 by Stephen King

The Drawing of the Three: The Dark Tower #2 by Stephen King

The Waste Lands: The Dark Tower #3 by Stephen King

 

 

Sherlock Holmes short stories

The Crooked Man by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle:

 

 

Shakespeare comedies:

The Winter’sTale

As You Like it

 

 

Non-Fiction:

Foxe’s Christian Martyrs of the World

Cinema Speculation by Quentin Tarantino

Warrior Preachers by David A. Harrell

Withstand by Ryan Kimmel & Jonathan Delger

The Imitation of Christ by Thomas à Kempis

 

 

 

Christmas reads:

The Elves and the Shoemaker by the Brothers Grimm

A Kidnapped Santa Claus by L. Frank Baum

Noel a poem by J. R. R. Tolkien

 

 

One Reading Challenge:

What’s in a Name? 2024

 

.

 

Christmas Tales 2024

The Magi honored the Christ child with three gifts. 

In honor of the magi, I read three Christmas tales each December.

 

The Elves and the Shoemaker by the Brothers Grimm

 

The tale of a humble and honest shoemaker near the end of his resources. He lays out material for one last pair of shoes, intending to finish them in the morning. He awakes to find a marvelous pair of shoes, all made that sell for a premium. This goes on for many nights until the shoemaker and his wife keep watch one night to discover the helpful elves who are inexplicably naked. The shoemaker’s wife makes a tiny set of clothes for each tiny shoemaker. The elves are giddy with delight and prance away, but the shoemaker is prosperous enough by this time that we assume he makes a comfortable living on his own.

 

It is intended, no doubt, to show the virtues of honesty, charity, and gratitude. It is very short and sweet, but definitely intended for very young children.

 

 

A Kidnapped Santa Claus by L. Frank Baum

 

From the author of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz comes a Christmas fantasy of the year Santa is kidnapped by some jealous neighbors: the daemons of Selfishness, Envy, Hatred, Malice, and Repentance. Before they resort to kidnapping, they try to spoil Santa’s reputation by tempting him with their special vices, but the Jolly Old Elf is immune to their wiles, so they resort to more desperate measures. It all comes right in the end, and even though Santa fails to make his Christmas Eve rounds, some of Santa’s helpers make the deliveries for him with only minor mixups resulting in some oddly matched gifts and recipients.

 

Also very short, but not so well known. Any similarity to a major motion picture is purely coincidental. Although…A Kidnapped Santa Claus is in the public domain, so… just sayin.

 

 

Noel by J. R. R. Tolkien

 

A poem by the author of The Lord of the Rings. I've read most everthing Tolkien wrote, but this was unknown to me until this year. It was unknown to anyone until 2013.

It's an homage to the birth of our Lord, and a bit less traditional. Tolkien paints a picture of the night of Christ's birth describing bleak winter scenes. I believe the imagery is metaphorical for the hopeless condition of man without a savior, rather than a physical description of the night that night. It's quite beautiful.

 

Mary sang in this world below:
They heard her song arise
O’er mist and over mountain snow
To the walls of Paradise,
And the tongue of many bells was stirred
in Heaven’s towers to ring
When the voice of mortal maid was heard,
That was mother of Heaven’s King.

 

The poem in entirety can be found HERE.

 

Merry Christmas

          ~ The Wanderer

 

May you be blessed with

the spirit of the season, which is Peace,

the gladness of the season, which is Hope,

and the heart of the season, which is Love

 

.

The Waste Lands: The Dark Tower series #3 by Stephen King (novel #237)

He thought he was at last beginning to fully understand what that innocuous phrase – the world has moved on – really meant. What a breadth of ignorance and evil it covered. ~ thoughts of Eddie Dean

The Waste Lands is the third in Stephen King's eight-volume The Dark Tower series. It is a dark fantasy set in Earth’s future, where physical and metaphysical laws are significantly altered. There is some collective memory of the old world, and characters describe the present state as a world that has “moved on.” There are portals between Roland’s world and the old world.

 

In volume I, the reader is introduced to the gunslinger Roland Deschain. Gunslinger is not so much a description as a title or profession: a knightly order trained in personal combat to be defenders of justice. Roland is the last of the gunslingers.

He had never been a man who understood himself deeply or cared to; the concept of self-consciousness (let alone self-analysis) was alien to him.

 

Like many things in this series, the reader gradually learns the full meaning and significance of “gunslinger.”

He was not broad-shouldered, as Marshal Dillon had been, nor anywhere near as tall, and his face seemed to her more that of a tired poet than a wild-west lawman, but she had still seen him as an existential version of that make-believe Kansas peace officer…  ~ Susannah’s perception of Roland Deschain

 

Roland is on a quest to find the Dark Tower, and once finding it presumably to set something right that has somehow gone wrong in the world that moved on. Through volume #3, the exact purpose of gaining the Dark Tower is not yet precisely clear.

 

In volume #1, Roland was alone. In volume #2, he picks up two companions from 20th-century America: Eddie, a former drug addict, and Susannah, a former schizophrenic and double-leg amputee. Eddie and Susanah become Roland’s companions and gunslingers in training. In The Waste Lands, the three risk great peril to add one more to their group, a boy named Jake, also from the 20th century. It is unclear if Jake will also become a gunslinger, only that Roland loves him like a son. But nothing…NOTHING…is more important than finding the Dark Tower.

 

I enjoyed this volume. It was exciting, like each volume thus far, but it might have been my least favorite. King has created a world of fantastic physical and meta-physical qualities that, in this volume, seemed a little incongruous and confusing. Perhaps my confusion made them seem incongruous. Nonetheless, hard to put it down. So far, each volume reaches a dangerous climax, a miraculous victory, and a brief return to normalcy, normal for Roland’s world, but no real closure. The action and desperation usually pick up quickly in the next volume, so I am off to begin volume #4.

 

My rating: 3 1/2 out of 5 stars

 

 

In the King multiverse, I understand that there is an interconnection of most, if not all, of Stephen King’s stories. The only other work I’ve read by King is The Stand (loved it), and I’m familiar with a few others due to film. So, I won’t detect most interconnections, but I did find one between The Stand and The Dark Tower. At one point, while traveling the wastelands, Roland and company find a 20th-century newspaper that refers to a worldwide pandemic that exterminated most of humanity. The article identifies the virus as Captain Trips: a direct reference to the pandemic in The Stand.

 

.

 

Withstand by Ryan Kimmel & Jonathan Delger

Withstand: The Culture War is a Spiritual Battle

by Ryan Kimmel & Jonathan Delger

 

 

Withstand is Christian non-fiction. The subtitle gives the central premise: that our current culture war is a spiritual battle for Christians. It provides practical advice on how to withstand the weapons of the enemy by donning the “full armor of God” from Ephesians 6:15-17

 

• the belt of truth
• the breastplate of righteousness
• the boots of peace
• the helmet of salvation
• the sword of the Spirit

 

I am a lifelong student of the Bible and found nothing new in this teaching (I’d be dubious if there were something new). But, it has practical applications in our modern context. I found it insightful and helpful.

 

The authors made one all-important point that I feel is sometimes missed in teachings on this subject:

 

Perhaps one of the most effective strategies of the enemy at this cultural moment is to make us think that other people are our enemy.

 

As Christians, the first thing we think of any person we see should be this – there is a person made in the image of God (Genesis 1:27). Until we see the humanity in people before we see the difference in our politics, we will never be the sort of people needed to bring the message of peace to the world.

 

Amen!

 

Rejoice in the Lord always; again I say, rejoice. Let your reasonableness be known to everyone. The Lord is at hand; do not be anxious about anything, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to God. And the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus. Philippians 4: 4-7.

 

 

Two local pastors wrote this short book. I don’t believe it is available through normal outlets, though they may be planning a second printing. More information is available at resoundmedia.cc

The Imitation of Christ by Thomas à Kempis

The Imitation of Christ by Thomas à Kempis

     Translated by Rev. William Benham

 

 

The Imitation of Christ is a Christian devotional written anonymously in the early 15th century. Today, it is commonly attributed to Thomas à Kempis, a German-Dutch Catholic priest. It is one of the most widely read Christian works, apart from the Bible.

 

I first learned of this work from a contemporary Christian author who quoted from its text. Then, a fellow believer recommended it, warning that it would challenge my self-perception. Still, later, I learned of noteworthy theologians who thought highly of it.

 

The title alone excites me. It suggests the highest ideal, which I imperfectly aspire to: Christ-likeness. So, I was eager to read this work and had high expectations. However, I was disappointed by certain points and took great exception to one.

 

The author warns about the lure of the world and one’s ego, with little appeal to be like Christ. The author lived and preached a monastic lifestyle and withdrawal from the world, which I cannot reconcile with the Great Commission of Jesus Christ:

 

Go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you... Matthew 28:19-20

 

Despite these issues, the author made some good points. His words convicted me of my shortcomings in mirroring Christ's ideal. In my prayer life, I often ask the Lord to help me see myself as he sees me. The author gave me much food for thought.

 

However, I have one rather significant issue with the author’s writing. He would often write as if in the words of Christ himself. For example:

 

As I of my own will offered myself unto God the Father on the Cross for thy sins with outstretched hands and naked body, so that nothing remained in Me that did not become altogether a sacrifice for the Divine propitiation; so also oughtest thou every day to offer thyself willingly unto Me for a pure and holy oblation with all thy strength and affections, even to the utmost powers of thine heart.

 

I believe this is a serious offense. We are never free to claim something as the words of Christ that Christ did not say. At the very least, it is presumptuous, as if Christ needs a little help with his message. At worst, it is sacrilege.

 

I am reluctant to censure so strongly since greater minds than mine have quoted and lauded this work. But I am lukewarm at best about this devotional.

 

.